Johannes Müller
Institute for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University
Theodor Ignat
Bucharest Municipality Museum, Bucharest; Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest
Valentin Parnic
Lower Danube Museum, Călărași
Adrian Bălășescu
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest; Institute of Archaeology “Vasile Pârvan” Bucharest, Romanian Academy
Marta Dal Corso
University of Padua, Department of Geosciences
Stefan Dreibrodt
Institute for Ecosystem Research, Kiel University
Sonja Filatova
University of Groningen, Faculty of Arts
Eileen Eckmeier
Institute for Ecosystem Research, Kiel University
Robert Hofmann
Institute for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University
Wiebke Kirleis
Institute for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University
Wolfgang Rabbel
Institute of Geosciences, Kiel University
Valentin Radu
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest; National History Museum of Romania, Bucharest
Mihaela Golea
Institute of Archaeology “Vasile Pârvan” Bucharest, Romanian Academy
Andreea Toma
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest
Frank Schlütz
Institute for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University
Amelie Schmücker
Institute for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University
Adrian Șerbănescu
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest
Yevhenii Sliesariev
Institute for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University
Manuel Zolchow
Institute for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology, Kiel University
Vlad Ioan Bindea
Bucharest Municipality Museum, Bucharest; Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest
Cristian Roth
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest
Cristina Covătaru
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest
Ana García-Vázquez
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest
Cătălin Lazăr
Research Institute of the University of Bucharest (ICUB), ArchaeoSciences Platform (ASp), University of Bucharest, Bucharest
Abstract
The Gumelnița/KGK VI tell settlement of Sultana-Malu Roșu is located in the valley of the Mostiștea, a tributary of the Lower Danube. It has been the target of archaeological investigations for 100 years. A new profile section has clarified stratigraphic questions and provided information on dating, environment and economy. It was possible to trace the construction, use and destruction of a fortification and to record settlement horizons and terraces. Documented settlement activities begin around 4450 BCE and end around 4300 BCE. The destruction of the fortification around 4380 BCE is associated with terracing and additional backfilling to extend the tell in order to obtain additional space for buildings. At the end of the occupation, a diversification of the food supply can be demonstrated, in particular the importance of foraging and hunting increased. Similar changes were also observed at other Early Chalcolithic tells on the Lower Danube. This is a typical pattern in subsistence crises, which in this case led to considerable transformative processes. Initial isotope analyses point to increasing warming and desertification, which may have led to food crises and subsequently to the abandonment of the tell.